| QUOTE (Tr@ck @ September 25, 2006 07:17 pm) |
| first question is verify the title you have with the Register of Deeds to see if it is located within a previous lot or see the previous TCT (you did say there was a new TCT (title) issued, as a matter of procedure the old TCT (where the name of the reputed previous owner is annotated) should have been cancelled... >>> First of all, Marami pong salamat. Na verify na po ito ng mother ko, pero not sure lang ako about the location. At saka kasi di ko pa talaga nakita iyong titulo. sale of lands can be made through an agent so long as there is a clear agency agreement showing authority to procure buyers for the said piece of land issued by or allowed by the previous owner. since you did say there was a title issued, and no question as to the issuance was made, i think that you have a defensible title over the property. now the question that remains is if a) the seller (through his agent) had rights of ownership over the property... if there is then there is no problem... you need only to sit tight and let them chase you... but if there is no right, then you have to exert your right as a buyer in good faith (duly and rightfully recognized as owner through the validly issued TCT)... this time you have to intervene in the court case over the property to exert your right and to remove cloud over your own title... question of prescription remains hanging though... ganito kasi yan, titulo kasi ang nagpapatunay ng karapatan ng pag mamay-ari sa lupa... ang karapatan mo ay nag-uugat sa mga karapatan ng nagmamay-ari bago sa iyo... ngayon kung wala o dili kaya'y may alinlangan sa karapatan ng nagbenta sa iyo, maapektuhan ang mga karapatan mo... ang pinag-uusapan natin ay titulo at hindi kung ano pang kasunduang nakasulat... bilang paniguro, alamin mo ang ugat ng alitan ng mga nagsasabing may-ari, pabakuran mo ang lupang nakasaad sa titulo mo na pagmamay-ari mo... ipagbigay alam mo na sa korte na may isyu ka tungkol sa usaping nahaharap sa korte... kailangan mo nga ng abugado dito... i hope this helps... >>>authorized naman po iyong nag-benta sa amin. Ang problema po ei doon sa sinasabi ninyong "karapatan ng nagbenta sa iyo, maapektuhan ang mga karapatan mo" Kasi itong MAN1 (iyon unang may ari) ay nag-benta ng ilang ektarya na lupa kay MAN2 (iyon pong pinag-bilhan namin). Dahil sa pag-aakala sigurong hindi magiging kapakipakinabang ang lupa dahil bundok at manaka-naka pa lang ang taong naliligaw don(part of antipolo). Dahil halos maubos na mabenta ang lupa, biglang sumulpot si MAN1, at sinasabing ang ilang block (composed po ng 116 sq.m to 150 sq.m per block...sa pag-kaka alam ko) na lupa na iyon ay hindi kasali sa pinag-bili kay MAN2., so ang nangyari pinabakuran ang ilang block na iyon at kasali doon ang lupa na nabili ko. At sa kasalukuyan "daw" ei nag-kakasuhan silang dalawa tungkol dito sa ilang block ng lupa kung sino ang tunay na nag-ma may ari nito at kung hanggang saan ang hangganan ng lupa ang ibeninta kay MAN2 ni MAN1. Iyon na po iyon. |
| QUOTE (the_king_of_wishful_thinking @ September 26, 2006 01:09 am) |
| hmmmm... you can do one of two things... wait for a resolution on their dispute or file your own petition to intervene being a sucessor in interest (by way of sale) which would be necessary to establish proprietary rights and remove clouds over title to be issued... either mag-antay ka at umaksiyon pagtapos nila or ngayon pa lang makigulo ka na.. your choice... just make sure of the title you have... it better be the original copy of the TCT, with attachments of subdivision plan from the previous TCT... check with the Antipolo RD... another option is to form an association of those other landowners adjacent to yours to stake your claim over the properties brought... there is strength in numbers... form an association so you can beter protect yourself... i hope this helps... |
| QUOTE (hmaritesc @ September 27, 2006 02:46 am) |
| Have a Pleasant day whisfull thinking, it is possible that the 3 years old kid having property with Transfer of TCT under her name represented of her/his Grand Parents? at young ages? |
| QUOTE (the_king_of_wishful_thinking @ October 09, 2006 06:47 pm) |
| what we have is voidable title over property... it depends on how the three year old came to be the owner of the said property... is it by donation (meaning by gift) then a whole set of rules apply... is it by succession (inheritance by testamentary or by operation of law)... if the name of the child is on the title, then there must be a guardian over the said person since the child cannot exercise rights of ownership... i hope this helps... |
| QUOTE (the_king_of_wishful_thinking @ October 10, 2006 01:04 am) |
| by your description, the grandparents are trustees of the three year old child as to the property.. i would presume it is by succession (if the parents are already deceased, and by operation of law the child becomes the universal heir) or donation from the parents of the child (by gift or a trust was instituted by the parents)... the trust agreement must clearly indicate the name and powers of the trustee vis a vis the property and the beneficiary... what seems to be the problem then ma'am? |
| QUOTE (madaku_mobutu @ October 14, 2006 05:31 pm) |
| I'm in Australia & thinking of reinventing myself & starting a law career from the bottom, by taking up a paralegal course & working as a part time clerk in a law office. I'm in no real hurry anyway. Any comments? Advanced thanks! |