one of the most disdained professions...

usually they call themselves lawyer, esquire, counselor, attorney, conflict manger among other things allowable here...

so i offer this little piece of the site for any inquiries anyone may have...

after all, ignorance of the law excuses no one...

uy.. welcome


lawyer ka ba??? saan?

my question is.. kelangan pa ba ng parents consent kahit 21 ka na at gustongmagpakasal sa pilipinas?? what if di mo kinuha consent nila... null and void ung kasal nyo???

thanks for the warm welcome...

yes i am a lawyer..here in the Philippines...

to answer your question, no the marriage would not be voided...but according to the Family Code, parental consent is required until 21, parental advice until 25 for any one of the persons to be married...the consequence for the absence of the requisites of consent/advice is the suspension of the issuance of the marriage license for three (3) months...any issuance of a marriage license within that period is prohibited subject to administrative sanctions...and since there is no license then marriage would be voidable (meaning valid until voided)....

i hope this helps...

hmmmm...all is quiet...

may consultation fee ba dito?

i don't think that's going to be a problem...

i am, after all, cheap and easy...

dagdag ko pa edz...wala kang katalo talo sa kaso...si master wish ata to..kaya mag file ka na..

*ops bawal pala OT at kwentuhan dito...babye.

kapag ba 28 years nang hiwalay ang mag-asawa..di pa ba automatic na annuled na ang marriage nila?

ang mahal naman kasi ng annulment..

Philippine Taxation in Easy Lessons:

If you make money, you pay tax.
If you spend money, you pay tax.
If you make more money, you don't necessarily have to pay more tax.

You can join the BIR or BOC.
You can buy the BIR or BOC.

Or you can try to get the hell out of this country.
But not without paying the tax first.

sorry jam there is no such thing as an expiry date (or in legal parlance laches due to prescription) for separated couples regarding their marriages... the only automatic operation for annulment of marriage is by death of one of the spouses, subject to certain rules (180 days after marriage etc etc)... so jam you still need to go through the process unless you can prove your husband had passed on already...

for madako, only two things are certain death and taxes... but one can certainly cheat on one of them...

why naman kaya annulment procedure is very costly? and is it true na both parties must see a shrink?

sana pala kunin na sya ni Lord para menos gastos..

that is true if you seek to have the marriage annulled due o psychological incapacity... there ares ome other causes for annulment... and there's dissolution...
likew what i told you before, if procedurally infirmities exist at the time of the celebration of the marriage, then the way to go is dissolution... but if it is about the marriage (or some endemic quality or prohibited act perpetrated done by one against the other) then it's annulment... and again there is death...

it's costly because of the time and effort ( and the excavation of memories) plus the PF of the lawyer and court costs (appearances, docket fees plus your costs to go to and fro to attend the hearing)

it's still your call...

Mag-tatanong lang pow...kung pwede. Pero mag-kwe-kwento muna ako.

About property pow ito.

Ganito po iyon. Ng bumili ng lupa ang mother ko on my behalf, wala pang gulo non. Pero ng malapit ko ng matapos bayaran ang lupa, lumabas ang isang tao at sabi na hindi legal ang pag-kaka benta ng lupa sa amin dahil lumagpas o di na sakop ang lupang iyon sa ipinagbili sa kasalukuyang "may-ari" ng lupa na siya naming pinag-bilhan. Syempre pa, pinuntahan namin iyong ahente na nag-benta sa amin at sinabing hindi totoo iyon. Kaya tinapos ko ang bayaran sa lupa. Ngayon nag-babayad ako ng yearly tax at may titulo kaming hawak.

Ang pinoproblema ko, kung saka-sakali ano ang magiging habol ko sa lupang iyon, dahil ang "sabi-sabi" nag-kakasuhan ang dalawang tao na nag-sasabing sila ang may-ari ng lupa. At saka sinama sa binakuran ang lupang nabili ko ng taong nag-sasabi na siya talaga ang legal na may-ari ng lupa na iyon at hindi iyong nag-benta sa amin. Pwede po bang paki linaw ito?

Mag-tatanong lang pow...kung pwede. Pero mag-kwe-kwento muna ako.

About property pow ito.

Ganito po iyon. Ng bumili ng lupa ang mother ko on my behalf, wala pang gulo non. Pero ng malapit ko ng matapos bayaran ang lupa, lumabas ang isang tao at sabi na hindi legal ang pag-kaka benta ng lupa sa amin dahil lumagpas o di na sakop ang lupang iyon sa ipinagbili sa kasalukuyang "may-ari" ng lupa na siya naming pinag-bilhan. Syempre pa, pinuntahan namin iyong ahente na nag-benta sa amin at sinabing hindi totoo iyon. Kaya tinapos ko ang bayaran sa lupa. Ngayon nag-babayad ako ng yearly tax at may titulo kaming hawak. first question is verify the title you have with the Register of Deeds to see if it is located within a previous lot or see the previous TCT (you did say there was a new TCT (title) issued, as a matter of procedure the old TCT (where the name of the reputed previous owner is annotated) should have been cancelled...

Ang pinoproblema ko, kung saka-sakali ano ang magiging habol ko sa lupang iyon, dahil ang "sabi-sabi" nag-kakasuhan ang dalawang tao na nag-sasabing sila ang may-ari ng lupa. At saka sinama sa binakuran ang lupang nabili ko ng taong nag-sasabi na siya talaga ang legal na may-ari ng lupa na iyon at hindi iyong nag-benta sa amin. Pwede po bang paki linaw ito?

sale of lands can be made through an agent so long as there is a clear agency agreement showing authority to procure buyers for the said piece of land issued by or allowed by the previous owner. since you did say there was a title issued, and no question as to the issuance was made, i think that you have a defensible title over the property. now the question that remains is if a) the seller (through his agent) had rights of ownership over the property... if there is then there is no problem... you need only to sit tight and let them chase you... but if there is no right, then you have to exert your right as a buyer in good faith (duly and rightfully recognized as owner through the validly issued TCT)... this time you have to intervene in the court case over the property to exert your right and to remove cloud over your own title... question of prescription remains hanging though...

ganito kasi yan, titulo kasi ang nagpapatunay ng karapatan ng pag mamay-ari sa lupa... ang karapatan mo ay nag-uugat sa mga karapatan ng nagmamay-ari bago sa iyo... ngayon kung wala o dili kaya'y may alinlangan sa karapatan ng nagbenta sa iyo, maapektuhan ang mga karapatan mo... ang pinag-uusapan natin ay titulo at hindi kung ano pang kasunduang nakasulat... bilang paniguro, alamin mo ang ugat ng alitan ng mga nagsasabing may-ari, pabakuran mo ang lupang nakasaad sa titulo mo na pagmamay-ari mo... ipagbigay alam mo na sa korte na may isyu ka tungkol sa usaping nahaharap sa korte... kailangan mo nga ng abugado dito...

i hope this helps...

first question is verify the title you have with the Register of Deeds to see if it is located within a previous lot or see the previous TCT (you did say there was a new TCT (title) issued, as a matter of procedure the old TCT (where the name of the reputed previous owner is annotated) should have been cancelled...

>>> First of all, Marami pong salamat.

Na verify na po ito ng mother ko, pero not sure lang ako about the location. At saka kasi di ko pa talaga nakita iyong titulo.

sale of lands can be made through an agent so long as there is a clear agency agreement showing authority to procure buyers for the said piece of land issued by or allowed by the previous owner. since you did say there was a title issued, and no question as to the issuance was made, i think that you have a defensible title over the property. now the question that remains is if a) the seller (through his agent) had rights of ownership over the property... if there is then there is no problem... you need only to sit tight and let them chase you... but if there is no right, then you have to exert your right as a buyer in good faith (duly and rightfully recognized as owner through the validly issued TCT)... this time you have to intervene in the court case over the property to exert your right and to remove cloud over your own title... question of prescription remains hanging though...

ganito kasi yan, titulo kasi ang nagpapatunay ng karapatan ng pag mamay-ari sa lupa... ang karapatan mo ay nag-uugat sa mga karapatan ng nagmamay-ari bago sa iyo... ngayon kung wala o dili kaya'y may alinlangan sa karapatan ng nagbenta sa iyo, maapektuhan ang mga karapatan mo... ang pinag-uusapan natin ay titulo at hindi kung ano pang kasunduang nakasulat... bilang paniguro, alamin mo ang ugat ng alitan ng mga nagsasabing may-ari, pabakuran mo ang lupang nakasaad sa titulo mo na pagmamay-ari mo... ipagbigay alam mo na sa korte na may isyu ka tungkol sa usaping nahaharap sa korte... kailangan mo nga ng abugado dito...

i hope this helps...


>>>authorized naman po iyong nag-benta sa amin. Ang problema po ei doon sa sinasabi ninyong "karapatan ng nagbenta sa iyo, maapektuhan ang mga karapatan mo" Kasi itong MAN1 (iyon unang may ari) ay nag-benta ng ilang ektarya na lupa kay MAN2 (iyon pong pinag-bilhan namin). Dahil sa pag-aakala sigurong hindi magiging kapakipakinabang ang lupa dahil bundok at manaka-naka pa lang ang taong naliligaw don(part of antipolo). Dahil halos maubos na mabenta ang lupa, biglang sumulpot si MAN1, at sinasabing ang ilang block (composed po ng 116 sq.m to 150 sq.m per block...sa pag-kaka alam ko) na lupa na iyon ay hindi kasali sa pinag-bili kay MAN2., so ang nangyari pinabakuran ang ilang block na iyon at kasali doon ang lupa na nabili ko.

At sa kasalukuyan "daw" ei nag-kakasuhan silang dalawa tungkol dito sa ilang block ng lupa kung sino ang tunay na nag-ma may ari nito at kung hanggang saan ang hangganan ng lupa ang ibeninta kay MAN2 ni MAN1. Iyon na po iyon.